Making A Murderer: Sussex Police Video Shows Steven Avery's Blood Evidence Was Tampered? WATCH

If you are one of the million of people hooked on the Netflix documentary series Making A Murderer, you have your opinions when it comes to the U.S. justice system. Steven Avery and his nephew Brendan Dassey are currently behind bars for the rape, murder and dismemberment of Autotrader photographer Teresa Halbach. Since the show's debut, fans worldwide have shared their views on the shaky evidence and new video from Sussex police reveals that the blood evidence may have been tampered with.

Avery was wrongly accused for rape and served almost two decades in prison before being vindicated. After being released, Avery returned to his life but it was all cut short once he was charged and later imprisoned for the Halbach crime. After carefully going through the case many people, special investigators included have found discrepancies when it comes to the evidence found and used against Avery and Dassey.

According to Morning News USA, a video released by Sussex Police highlights the evidence against Avery's blood to have possibly been tampered with.

Since the beginning, it has been believed that law enforcement officials tampered with evidence so that they can make the charges stick to Avery. According to crime scene investigator Chris Gee, Manitowoc County dropped the ball when it came to protecting the evidence, which is a cause of concern with its validity.

"It's all about trying to give evidence as much integrity as possible, Gee tells Morning News USA. " Manitowoc County law enforcement may not have done everything in their power to properly protect the evidence, leaving some important questions unanswered."

Blood was found in Halbach's SUV, which police linked to Avery. The problem is that the location of where the blood was found (the ignition) was questionable. Also, the county already had a blood sample from Avery stemming from his false arrest and imprisonment on rape charges.

Gee questions the integrity of the evidence after it was revealed that the vial of blood the county had of Avery had no exhibit label. The label in question would contain pertinent information, such as who opened the bag and for what purpose was the blood evidence used.

The video in question highlights the blood evidence and the different theories of how the blood could have been placed in Halbach's vehicle. Gee takes viewers on a step-by-step analysis of how blood evidence should be used in criminal cases and what how evidence could become inconclusive.

Readers, what do you think? Sound off below!